Go Back   Scale Models > Aircraft > General Aircraft Chat

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17-03-2005   #1 (permalink)
Moderator
 
wonwinglo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Warwick,UK
Real Name: Barry
My Models: Aviation artifacts
Visit wonwinglo's Gallery
Posts: 5,579
Images: 49
Aerodynamic muslings.

The latest test paper issued by the civil aviation authority has some devious questions,this one caught my eye,I even queried it with them only to be told that it was written by a 20,000 hour pilot,the question is very relevant to large scale models,look at all of the options carefully before making your own decision-

Q3
Why is it that, when an aircraft is flown with an aft C of G
position, it is appreciably less stable in both pitch and yaw?
a. the C of G and C of P are too close together
b. the moment arm of the empennage is reduced
c. C of G makes no difference to stability
d. an aft C of G involves a higher angle of incidence and more
downwash over the tailplane
__________________
'And there I was oil on my goggles from a broken pipe,then I looked at the altimeter,all I could see was the makers name !'
www.wonwinglo.scale-models.net/
wonwinglo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 17-03-2005   #2 (permalink)
George
Guest
 
Visit George's Gallery
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by wonwinglo
The latest test paper issued by the civil aviation authority has some devious questions,this one caught my eye,I even queried it with them only to be told that it was written by a 20,000 hour pilot,the question is very relevant to large scale models,look at all of the options carefully before making your own decision-

Q3
Why is it that, when an aircraft is flown with an aft C of G
position, it is appreciably less stable in both pitch and yaw?
a. the C of G and C of P are too close together
b. the moment arm of the empennage is reduced
c. C of G makes no difference to stability
d. an aft C of G involves a higher angle of incidence and more
downwash over the tailplane
I think the answer lies in the soil my boy or maybe evn does your chewing gum loose it's flavour on the bed post overnight
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 17-03-2005   #3 (permalink)
Scale Model Member
 
Glider Guider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Real Name: David
My Models: AcroWot, Auster J1, FW 190, various sports models and gliders
Visit Glider Guider's Gallery
Posts: 78
Images: 16
I would say answer a) is correct as the simple plausible answer that makes sense aerodamically (to me). Answer c) is the throw away and the other two sound very technical and could well be correct - but in all honesty I don't really understand them.
Glider Guider is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 17-03-2005   #4 (permalink)
Moderator
 
wonwinglo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Warwick,UK
Real Name: Barry
My Models: Aviation artifacts
Visit wonwinglo's Gallery
Posts: 5,579
Images: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by Techydave
I would say answer a) is correct as the simple plausible answer that makes sense aerodamically (to me). Answer c) is the throw away and the other two sound very technical and could well be correct - but in all honesty I don't really understand them.
*** Thats fair comment Dave,I dont go for these sort of questions personally as I think they are tactically worded to confuse,typical of the way the CAA complicates things,basically a pilot needs to know his stalling speed,his centre of gravity is correctly calculated,and he has sufficent fuel for flight,the Air Transport Auxiliary delivered all types of high performance aircraft in wartime with little more than a simplified abbreviated 20 page booklet and they followed simple logic ! add to this no navigational aids and poor weather deliveries,but they did a fantastic job delivering front line aircraft.
We will leave it open for a bit for those still trying to work it out.
__________________
'And there I was oil on my goggles from a broken pipe,then I looked at the altimeter,all I could see was the makers name !'
www.wonwinglo.scale-models.net/
wonwinglo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:46.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004 - 2008 Scale Model Forums
Comprar vivienda Denia | Hotels | Cheap Car Insurance | Vegas Hotel | New York Hotels
ServInt Internet Services