Finally got some flying on my Hanger 9 Funtana 40S tonight after fitting an ASP 91 four stroke a while ago. Previously it was fitted with a Thunder Tiger 61 Pro two stroke.
Well, let me tell ya, this finally clears up the argument for me over whether two stroke or four stroke engines are the best for 3D flying! Four stroke wins it hands down!
With the two stroke 61 I could barely hover and the pull out was gonna end in disaster sooner rather than later. Throttle response was pretty good and clean but didn't translate into thrust somehow. This is difficult to explain but those who're flying their 3D models on four strokes after using two strokes will know what I mean. There was also a problem with the engine leaning out when inverted - not a problem - but it's like someone else is controlling the throttle!
Ah, but the four stroke! What a revelation. Despite the fact that its about one bhp LESS powerful than the two stroke it hovers easily and climbs out with authority - plenty of go even despite the fact that I'm using a 14x6 while we're running in AND she's really, really rich. What this motor is gonna be like when it's run in and using a 15x4W I just can't imagine! Should be a rocket! A big efficient prop' makes a huge difference, couple that with torque and you have exactly what you need for 3D.
The next thing is controlability. You ask for a bit of power and you get it immediately. It just provides the thrust exactly when you want it. It makes all the usual pattern type manoeuvres a sinch - in fact it seems odd to be throttling back on the vertical manoeuvres. Superb. AND it sounds absolutely great. I'm sold...
