Go Back   Scale Models > Modelling > Under Construction

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-05-2008   #41 (permalink)
No mess, no gain!
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rugeley, Staffordshire
Real Name: Terry
Visit Spyderman_uk's Gallery
Posts: 67
Images: 5
A lovely looking sub so far!
I've always thought the Akula class were a very menacing looking ship.

It is quite an educational experience for me seeing how everything fits and is sealed.
I too will be keen to see how it behaves without bow planes. Is this common practice or unique to this build?

One thing I am wondering about is why you have used three UJs in the prop shaft? As I understand things the centre UJ is not actually doing anything except acting as a spacer.
Is there not a danger of the centre UJ flailing around and hitting the control rods?

Terry
Spyderman_uk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 02-05-2008   #42 (permalink)
Scale Model Member
 
Mankster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London
My Models: RC Postwar Subs and Naval ships
Visit Mankster's Gallery
Posts: 263
It was just geometry, the vertical separation between the propshaft and motor shaft would mean additional drive loss due to the angle the double joint would have to make. I had to use a longer spacer between the 2 U joints than the one supplied and it just happens that a U joint third was just the right length No chance of them falling out, fits pretty tight.
Mankster is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2008   #43 (permalink)
Scale Model Member
 
Mankster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London
My Models: RC Postwar Subs and Naval ships
Visit Mankster's Gallery
Posts: 263
I finally got the first coat of primer on and happily there isnt as much sanding and filling as I feared. I managed to loose some of those hull sensors that came with the kit, but there should be some replacements in the post.





Mankster is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2008   #44 (permalink)
Scale Model Member
 
Mankster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London
My Models: RC Postwar Subs and Naval ships
Visit Mankster's Gallery
Posts: 263
I'm pleased with her so far, goes up and down pretty evenly and no dramas with the WTC. Sits pretty much bang on the intended waterline ( video ) which is pretty high on the Russiian doubled hull boats, with just a 500ml ballast tank. If anything I may add some more foam and lead to increase her metacentric height as I fear she'll torque roll when I fit the prop and open her up.





and video
YouTube - Akula K-157 Bath Test
Mankster is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 14-05-2008   #45 (permalink)
Scale Model Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Visit subzero's Gallery
Posts: 196
Outstanding Mankster, very well done


Sub.
subzero is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:07.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004 - 2008 Scale Model Forums
Credit Cards | Buy Anything On eBay | Credit Cards | Mortgages | Secured Loans
ServInt Internet Services