HELP my photos are awful

scottie3158

SMF Supporter
Joined
Apr 27, 2018
Messages
12,531
Points
113
Location
Spalding
First Name
Paul
Paul

there has been a lot of talk about "white balance" - does that term actually mean anything to you?

If not - it basically means that the camera can adjust the way it exposes the images based on the kind of lighting.
If you use natural daylight it will look different to tungsten (old-fashioned filament bulbs) or LED lights.
Normally the "auto" setting will try to adjust the colour of the image based on what it thinks the light source is.

It gets complicated when you have two or more light sources - try not to mix tungsten/halogen/LED lights - especially if you have a
very light coloured background. You mention a light-box - does it have its own lights?

If you use a pale blue background and "auto" white balance the camera can get confused and try to treat the background as white so
everything gets a slightly brown cast.

Have a read of the camera manual about "White Balance"

But as others have said - put the camera on a good support (e.g a tripod / gorillapod or similar) and use the self timer to avoid camera-shake.

Make sure it has focussed on the subject before taking the shot.

Mark
Mark,
thanks mate I didn't have a clue but did have a read in the manual after everyones wise words. I do have a little light box with a strip of LED's along the top front edge.

After reading the book I took 2 new photos using the Scene recognition setting on the camera the pictures are a lot better well brighter anyway. I guess i need to just keep practicing
 

Steve Jones

Steve Jones Scale Modelling Site
Joined
Apr 27, 2018
Messages
6,698
Points
113
Location
Plymouth
First Name
Steve
Well you and I have long struggled with our photos and tried most things. The three issues I have had are where to take the photos, lighting and depth of field

I have tried taking photos outside, inside, by the window, bits of paper behind, in a lighting box, white background, black background, blue background ets etc. So now I have put a large piece of blue card on the dressing table in the side room. Blue seems to be the one that creates the best lighting background. Also the curvature of the card means I dont have those ugly paper edges or "box look" style pictures

DSC00168.JPG

Next was the lighting issue. As I work all day I have to model at night so the majority of photos are taken in the night time. This means using the light from the ceiling light and a couple of lamps strategically positioned to get the best coverage. This is the result

DSC00169.JPG

When I do manage to position the light correcty the model then goes back into shadow when I move the camera close to take the photo

DSC00170.JPG

However I have recently invested in two "natural light" lamps off the internet HERE. They are fantasic! Fully adjustable so you can have vertical or horizontal light. They come with a heavy stand so no fear of them toppeling over. I have had them for a couple of weeks now and they have made my modeling life so much better. For example the exact same shot as above at the same distance with the same camera but with these two lamps used instead of the bedroom light and lamps and this is what you get.

DSC00171.JPG

Also this was taken at night time. I am still playing around to try and get rid of all shadows but it ceratinly is an improvement.

In my bench room I work off the room light and a small lamp

DSC00165.JPG

Now with one of the lamps by my side this is what I have

DSC00166.JPGDSC00167.JPG

So not only better photos but better working environment as well.

Now the depth of field issue. This has plagued me for many a year and still does. Front on pictures not too bad but the equipment at the back is still out of focus.

IMG_0884.JPG

But as soon as you do the length of vehicle, notice how the the shield and telescopic sights are all out of focus on the L/H side

IMG_0888.JPG

What I want is everything in focus. I have three cameras and I have tried all the things needed about ISO, shutter speed etc etc but my cameras are just not up to it. I have had some improvement by taking a shot further away when everything is in focus and then using the picture editor on the computer to zoom in and cut and crop the picture. However the picture then looks rather "grainy".

Saying all that close ups are the worst. Notice how the mug is clear but everything is blurred. What I want is a sharp image of everything

IMG_0896.JPG

I am now looking to get a magnification lens camera which will do 1:1 if not better but they aint cheap. Low end lenses are £2 -£300 with top end spec £1,000+. So I am busy saving up and hopefully one day I can get photos that others seem to get at close range. The mistake I made was buying cameras with high zoom features and not high magnification features. My only fear is once I get the lens it will show up all my mistakes! :smiling5: :smiling2:

Saying all that your latest photos of your finished truck are a vast improvement and its great to see more of your fantastic detailing mate.

Hope this helps

Steve
 
D

Deleted member 7181

Guest
Now the depth of field issue. This has plagued me for many a year and still does. Front on pictures not too bad but the equipment at the back is still out of focus.

I'm still fumbling around trying to get my pictures better, but one thing I'm looking into for the DOF issue is Focus stacking. Put very simply you take several snaps focussed on different areas, then blend them with "software". I'm still wading through the minefield but in theory it sounds like it would be what I'm looking for.

My phone has a pretty unique feature where I can take a picture then vary the focal point and DOF afterwards. I haven't figured that out either lol but might be another option for me, rather than buying expensive equipment.
 

Tim Marlow

Little blokes aficionado
SMF Supporter
Joined
Apr 27, 2018
Messages
16,546
Points
113
Location
Somerset
First Name
Tim
To maximise depth of field use the highest F number available. Further, the depth of field extends one third in front of the focus point and two thirds behind it, so focus one third of the way into the scene you want in focus. Lastly, the closer you are the shallower the depth of field, so shooting from a little further away and cropping in will improve DOF Up to a point, but too much cropping highlights the lack of resolution of the image. Focus stacking is a good idea as well, but will probably add artefacts from the post processing. Macro lenses are not necessarily the answer either. They usually need you to get really close to the subject, trading off depth of field against resolution. I have a 100mm one and don’t tend to use it much. They are great for extreme close ups, but the shots above would work better with a decent prime lens.
 

Jakko

Way past the mad part
SMF Supporter
Joined
Apr 28, 2018
Messages
10,592
Points
113
First Name
Jakko
What I want is everything in focus.
I already mentioned it above, but what about taking the photo from further away and cropping the image to what you need? This probably doesn’t work if you want a large photograph suitable for high-quality printing, but for posting on a forum it’s fine because you don’t need 4000-pixel-wide photos — the forum here resizes them to about 1000 pixels wide anyway.
 
D

Deleted member 7181

Guest
Jakko, did you not read the rest of the paragraph you quoted? Sounds like he's already tried that approach :smiling3:
 
D

Deleted member 7181

Guest
Had a quick n dirty play with an online stacking page. Not perfect by any means but more of the shot is more in focus, so I think with a bit of practice it might do the trick for posting on t'internet

One of the four pictures, focussed on the roundel.

OuA6KoT.jpg

"Stacked" image

edu2Ljg.png
 

scottie3158

SMF Supporter
Joined
Apr 27, 2018
Messages
12,531
Points
113
Location
Spalding
First Name
Paul
Thanks All,
It's good to know I'm not the only one who struggles but following the great advice I have seen a marked improvement in my pictures.
 

Jakko

Way past the mad part
SMF Supporter
Joined
Apr 28, 2018
Messages
10,592
Points
113
First Name
Jakko
Jakko, did you not read the rest of the paragraph you quoted? Sounds like he's already tried that approach :smiling3:
Crap, I’m doing it again, aren’t I? I read the first part, then begin to reply and forget to read on :sad:

Still, the method works for me, so I’m wondering what the pixel dimensions are of the photos Paul takes — could be that the problem is they’re too small to really zoom in on?
 

Gern

'Stashitis' victim
SMF Supporter
Joined
May 17, 2009
Messages
9,622
Points
113
Location
Stourbridge
First Name
Dave
I need help from those of you that can take a decent picture. I normally just leave my camera in auto. Even when I use my light box they are still terrible. If

Just finished reading through this entire thread. Everything after the sentence above looks like Sanskrit to me. I'm just going to have to suffer with poor pictures :upside: :sleeping2:
 
Top