Leningrad Rat

PJP

Peter/Pedro/Hey you
Joined
Feb 2, 2010
Messages
210
Points
16
First Name
Peter
I will be building a Polikarpov I16 Rata (Rat) from Leningrad, 1941/42.

This was the principal fighter aircraft of the Red Airforce in the first 18 months or so of the Great Patriotic War, having first flown in 1934 and was used in the Spanish Civil War.

Although outclassed by the main opposition, the Me 109, it gave a good account of itself until replaced by more modern aircraft.

This one was based in Leningrad and the kit offers the choice of ski or wheeled undercarriage.

I'll be building it with wheels but have yet to decide on which markings to use. As time goes on, I may develope it into some form of diorama, having bought in some figures, so the title may change if the opportunity presents. I may also include another aircraft with an element of surpirise, just for variety.

As the pictures show, it's a small aircraft and a simple (like me) with not a lot of parts. There's PE seatbelts and resin exhaust stacks but otherwise, it seems well moulded with nice panel lines and little flash to be seen.

Does seem expensive though for what you get. I suppose that's down to the numbers made/sold though.

Enough!

I'll see what it comes up like when I've given it all a wash and start the build.

Peter

View attachment 17889View attachment 17890View attachment 17891View attachment 17892View attachment 17893

View attachment 25687

View attachment 25688

View attachment 25689

View attachment 25690

View attachment 25691

IMG_0276.jpg

IMG_0279.jpg

IMG_0277.jpg

IMG_0275.jpg

IMG_0278.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

tr1ckey66

SMF Supporter
Joined
Mar 6, 2009
Messages
3,684
Points
113
First Name
Paul
Peter

I love the look of this aircraft! if you had to put a picture to the Russian military in WW2 then I don't think you do much better than show this aircraft. Great chice of subject Peter I'm really looking forward to this kit being built I'm sure it will be worth the expense.

Best of luck with the build

Paul
 
F

Fenlander

Guest
That is one interesting looking aircraft Peter. I must admit I have never really looked at Russian aircraft of this period but this is making me want to. Look forward to seeing your progress.
 

PJP

Peter/Pedro/Hey you
Joined
Feb 2, 2010
Messages
210
Points
16
First Name
Peter
View attachment 19453View attachment 19454View attachment 19455View attachment 19456View attachment 19457A bit more done on the Rat.

It has very few parts and with a little more time available to me, would have been a very quick build.

I have experienced the usual problem with a one piece central lower wing section, in that the wing joins will meet at the top or at the bottom only. Filling and filing, oh joygasm!!

Anyway, pictures of progress to date.

I must just say that the aircraft is very small and compared to other 1/32nd builds, is no more than 2/3rds of the size at best. Must have been a sod to see in battle!

Peter

View attachment 26804

View attachment 26805

View attachment 26806

View attachment 26807

View attachment 26808

IMG_0472.jpg

IMG_0468.jpg

IMG_0460.jpg

IMG_0469.jpg

IMG_0457.jpg
 

tr1ckey66

SMF Supporter
Joined
Mar 6, 2009
Messages
3,684
Points
113
First Name
Paul
Hi Pedro/Peter!

Just counted the squares on the cutting mat - 17cm fuselage, that is small for 1/32!

I love this aircraft though, it really has that Russian quirkyness.

Build looks to be coming along great and the wing roots look cool.

Keep up the great work

Paul
 

yak face

Wossupwidee?
Staff member
Moderator
SMF Supporter
Joined
Jun 13, 2009
Messages
12,261
Points
113
Location
sheffield
First Name
tony
Great choice peter!! The rata is one of my faves too ,if you think it looks small in 1/32 you should see it in 1/72!! Looking forward to seeing the end result,, COME ON THE RUSSIANS!!!! cheers tony
 

Ian M

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
SMF Supporter
Joined
Dec 14, 2008
Messages
19,583
Points
113
Location
Falster, Denmark
First Name
Ian
Thats not an airplane thats a motor with wings!

Interesting subject of which I know nada so I lookforwards to seeing the end result.

Ian M
 
Top