Jim R
SMF Supporter
Nicely done Jakko.
1/35 M70A2 Krueger MBT, Desert Storm, 1991
- Thread starter Jakko
- Start date
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2018
- Messages
- 10,797
- Points
- 113
- First Name
- Jakko
On closer inspection of photos, I skipped the sand. Instead, I added the tracks to the hull:
I drilled holes through the links at both ends and used copper wire to pull them together. Originally, the plan was to use strong thread, but my knot-tying skills weren’t up to getting the thread tight enough in the small confines of the suspension and angle of the hull. Copper wire worked well as an alternative, until I saw:—
that the idler wheel gets pulled outward because its mounting is rather weak. In the end, I cut the copper wire again and glued the tracks to the wheels instead:
I drilled holes through the links at both ends and used copper wire to pull them together. Originally, the plan was to use strong thread, but my knot-tying skills weren’t up to getting the thread tight enough in the small confines of the suspension and angle of the hull. Copper wire worked well as an alternative, until I saw:—
that the idler wheel gets pulled outward because its mounting is rather weak. In the end, I cut the copper wire again and glued the tracks to the wheels instead:
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2018
- Messages
- 10,797
- Points
- 113
- First Name
- Jakko
Side skirts on:
The supports I had built worked well, though the skirts themselves had warped a little since I built them two years or so ago. After straightening them out as much as possible, I glued and clamped them to the hull and all seems to be well.
I also glued the machine gun mount into its turret and its hatches:
The rods that automatically open and close the hatches when the gun rises and drops still need to be painted, of course.
And everything together temporarily, other than the mine plough:
This revealed a minor problem:
The machine-gun hatch fouls the driver’s hatch. This is most likely a mistake by Dragon, as these are parts I didn’t alter, but it means the gun turret can’t be aimed straight forward when the driver’s hatch is n the 12-o’clock position.
The supports I had built worked well, though the skirts themselves had warped a little since I built them two years or so ago. After straightening them out as much as possible, I glued and clamped them to the hull and all seems to be well.
I also glued the machine gun mount into its turret and its hatches:
The rods that automatically open and close the hatches when the gun rises and drops still need to be painted, of course.
And everything together temporarily, other than the mine plough:
This revealed a minor problem:
The machine-gun hatch fouls the driver’s hatch. This is most likely a mistake by Dragon, as these are parts I didn’t alter, but it means the gun turret can’t be aimed straight forward when the driver’s hatch is n the 12-o’clock position.
Jim R
SMF Supporter
Hi Jakko
Glad you got the tracks sorted ok. Probably better to have them glued anyway
That hatch issue is odd. Just maybe the hatch couldn't be fully opened when the MG was used??? Can't imagine Dragon getting it so obviously wrong but you never know
Jim
Glad you got the tracks sorted ok. Probably better to have them glued anyway
That hatch issue is odd. Just maybe the hatch couldn't be fully opened when the MG was used??? Can't imagine Dragon getting it so obviously wrong but you never know
Jim
Good work on the tracks. Strange issue with the hatches though Jakko. Do actual images of the tank show this as well?
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2018
- Messages
- 10,797
- Points
- 113
- First Name
- Jakko
I don’t know if it was like that on the real tank, but if Dragon put the driver’s hatch too far back by even half a millimetre, it ends up like this. I suspect that on the real thing, they just clear each other. Or maybe I glued the driver’s hatch at slightly too big an angle rearward.
Another minor problem I noticed was my own fault: I had built a new mine plough mount on the hull, because the M1 Abrams type of course wouldn’t fit. The original has two big eyes on the top corners, which I omitted because I didn’t see what their function was. Yesterday, trying to figure out where the various bits of chain go that are on these ploughs, I worked it out: a chain attaches to each of them. So that meant adding these bits after all:
I drilled a hole in a bit of 1 mm thick plastic card, cut and filed the half-round shape around it, then cut it off and glued the eye to the model (after scraping the paint off, of course). Still to be painted to match the rest of the model, naturally.
Another minor problem I noticed was my own fault: I had built a new mine plough mount on the hull, because the M1 Abrams type of course wouldn’t fit. The original has two big eyes on the top corners, which I omitted because I didn’t see what their function was. Yesterday, trying to figure out where the various bits of chain go that are on these ploughs, I worked it out: a chain attaches to each of them. So that meant adding these bits after all:
I drilled a hole in a bit of 1 mm thick plastic card, cut and filed the half-round shape around it, then cut it off and glued the eye to the model (after scraping the paint off, of course). Still to be painted to match the rest of the model, naturally.
The concussion from the 50 would seriously ruin the drivers week if hatch left open.
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2018
- Messages
- 10,797
- Points
- 113
- First Name
- Jakko
So do I
I think it probably didn’t, for various reasons.On the real MBT 70, of course, this was a 20 mm cannon with a much longer barrel, that projected a fair amount beyond the driver’s hatch, so that particular problem probably wouldn’t have been as severe:
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2018
- Messages
- 10,797
- Points
- 113
- First Name
- Jakko
After a quick paint job for the new eyes (sand colour, wash, then drybrush) they look like they have always been on the model:
Then the fun with the chains began. Tamiya’s M1A1 instructions say to tie the chain to the model with copper wire, but on the real tank, they were attached with D-clasps. Unfortunately, I don’t have ten such clasps that are small enough, and even if I did, the holes in the plough are too small for them. So, I decided to bend copper wire into an approximation of their shape. First up were the chains on the new eyes, because they would be hardest of all to reach with the plough on the tank:
And everything in place:
The “dog bone” is loose, I may or may not glue it to the model approximately where it is in the photos — on the real tank it was normally put there when not actively ploughing for mines. Now to find a way to paint these chains without making a mess … they are to be sand colour like the rest of the model.
Then the fun with the chains began. Tamiya’s M1A1 instructions say to tie the chain to the model with copper wire, but on the real tank, they were attached with D-clasps. Unfortunately, I don’t have ten such clasps that are small enough, and even if I did, the holes in the plough are too small for them. So, I decided to bend copper wire into an approximation of their shape. First up were the chains on the new eyes, because they would be hardest of all to reach with the plough on the tank:
And everything in place:
The “dog bone” is loose, I may or may not glue it to the model approximately where it is in the photos — on the real tank it was normally put there when not actively ploughing for mines. Now to find a way to paint these chains without making a mess … they are to be sand colour like the rest of the model.
scottie3158
SMF Supporter
Jakko,
Some nice neat work going on there.
Some nice neat work going on there.
Jim R
SMF Supporter
Hi Jakko
Chains look good. Fiddly stuff.
Jim
Chains look good. Fiddly stuff.
Jim
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2018
- Messages
- 10,797
- Points
- 113
- First Name
- Jakko
The plough is now finished, with the chains painted (same base colour and drybrush as the tank), and cables added from copper wire, the Tamiya handle and a bit of thread to tie the handle to the brush guard:
Those cables still need to be painted here, of course. (On the M1, the handle was usually tied to some fixture on the left rear of the glacis plate with a cable or strap of some sort. This seems a likely alternative for an MBT 70-type vehicle.)
Here’s the whole vehicle with those bits painted, finished as far as I’m concerned other than crew and stowage:
And said crew and stowage:
The crew is from Master Box, a set of Afghanistan figures, but I put Hornet heads onto them. Most people seem to build Gulf War tanks with crews in standard BDU uniforms, which is generally correct for Desert Shield, but not the ground phase of Desert Storm — tank crews were given nomex (fire-resistant) coveralls and slim tankers’ body armour just before the ground war started. Those are still in use today, so modern figures can be used for Desert Storm as well.
The stowage is from various sources, mainly Tamiya. The roadwheel is from an Italeri Leopard 2 with the bolts cut off and holes drilled to match MBT 70 wheels (ten bolts vs. eight). The style of the wheel isn’t quite the same but the diameter is, so it looks right, I think.
Those cables still need to be painted here, of course. (On the M1, the handle was usually tied to some fixture on the left rear of the glacis plate with a cable or strap of some sort. This seems a likely alternative for an MBT 70-type vehicle.)
Here’s the whole vehicle with those bits painted, finished as far as I’m concerned other than crew and stowage:
And said crew and stowage:
The crew is from Master Box, a set of Afghanistan figures, but I put Hornet heads onto them. Most people seem to build Gulf War tanks with crews in standard BDU uniforms, which is generally correct for Desert Shield, but not the ground phase of Desert Storm — tank crews were given nomex (fire-resistant) coveralls and slim tankers’ body armour just before the ground war started. Those are still in use today, so modern figures can be used for Desert Storm as well.
The stowage is from various sources, mainly Tamiya. The roadwheel is from an Italeri Leopard 2 with the bolts cut off and holes drilled to match MBT 70 wheels (ten bolts vs. eight). The style of the wheel isn’t quite the same but the diameter is, so it looks right, I think.