scottie3158
SMF Supporter
Steve,
Nice idea of the reversed masking.
Nice idea of the reversed masking.
Only because you’re staying within a system of measurements in the first case (because weird scale ratios like 1:32, 1:48 or 1:72 make sense in Imperial and US customary units), but not in the second. You’d have the same issues, but the other way around, if you have to, for example, mask a band that’s 145 cm wide on the real thing, on a 1:100 scale model. 14.5 mm is easy then, 0.57 inches becomes a little more difficult to do accurately.the Americans had yellow propeller tip, but theirs were only 4" rather than our 4.5". At 1/32 scale, I thought to myself, that would be 4 1/32s of an inch or 1/8". Being familiar with the imperial system I am now off to see if I have a ruler with which I can measure 1/8". The old system was not as bad as sometimes portrayed, try measuring 6.35 millimetres with your steel rule!
Only because you’re staying within a system of measurements in the first case (because weird scale ratios like 1:32, 1:48 or 1:72 make sense in Imperial and US customary units), but not in the second. You’d have the same issues, but the other way around, if you have to, for example, mask a band that’s 145 cm wide on the real thing, on a 1:100 scale model. 14.5 mm is easy then, 0.57 inches becomes a little more difficult to do accurately.
For FULL Forum access you can upgrade your account here UPGRADE