A bit of a quandary

stona

SMF Supporter
Joined
Jul 22, 2008
Messages
11,472
Points
113
First Name
Steve
So, as the title suggests, I'm in a bit of a quandary. This can be illustrated by the power of photography.

Hurris.jpg

As you can see, that's not one but two Hurricanes. I bought the first (Fly) kit before I knew that the second (Revell) kit existed.

My initial thought was to build the Revell kit since I have previously built the Fly kit, albeit a different version. I would still do a 'Malta' Hurricane at some stage.

Then I thought about building the two together, sort of side by side. The issue with that is I don't want to make it some kind of competition between kits from a fairly small scale manufacturer who have long done the best 1/32 Hurricane and a rather more heavyweight newcomer. Comparisons are inevitable, but should remain in that context, they are very different kits.

I'm favouring option two, a dual build, partly because the two kits are so different, but what does the honourable membership think?
 

minitnkr

Rabble & escape committee member
SMF Supporter
Joined
Apr 27, 2018
Messages
6,721
Points
113
Location
Dayton, OH
First Name
Paul
Always more. You can spend more time on the lessor to even things up or leave the warts to show the difference. I'd prefer the former.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JR

adt70hk

I know its a bit sad but I like quickbuild kits!!!
SMF Supporter
Joined
Sep 4, 2019
Messages
9,499
Points
113
First Name
Andrew
Definitely both!
 
  • Like
Reactions: JR

yak face

Wossupwidee?
Staff member
Moderator
SMF Supporter
Joined
Jun 13, 2009
Messages
12,400
Points
113
Location
sheffield
First Name
tony
A dual build is a great idea steve , although as you say , not a comparison , rather an example of how two makers might do things differently. Cheers tony
 

Mr Bowcat

SMF Supporter
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
3,647
Points
113
Location
London
First Name
Bob
Having built the Fly kit, I'm not sure I would ever want to build another one, despite how nice the exterior detail is.
 

colin m

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
SMF Supporter
Joined
Dec 26, 2008
Messages
8,604
Points
113
Location
Stafford, UK
First Name
Colin
Having built the Fly kit, I'm not sure I would ever want to build another one, despite how nice the exterior detail is.
I agree, it looks great finished, but the journey getting there. wow.
 

Jim R

SMF Supporter
Joined
Apr 27, 2018
Messages
13,729
Points
113
Location
Shropshire
First Name
Jim
It always interesting to see kits of the same subject compared so build them both side by side.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JR

stona

SMF Supporter
Joined
Jul 22, 2008
Messages
11,472
Points
113
First Name
Steve
Having built the Fly kit, I'm not sure I would ever want to build another one, despite how nice the exterior detail is.
I know what you mean, they certainly require a bit of work. I do have the advantage of having made at least a couple of their kits before, including a Hurricane :smiling3:

It looks like I'll do a side by side. I know what to expect from the Fly kit, but the Revell kit is a complete unknown, so we'll see where it goes.

To keep it fair I'll build both with what's in the box, with the exceptions of a decent harness and maybe some alternative markings (though I haven't yet thought about which aircraft I'll be attempting to replicate).

Hopefully I can make a start next week, when I'll post a build thread.
 

Gern

'Stashitis' victim
SMF Supporter
Joined
May 17, 2009
Messages
9,703
Points
113
Location
Stourbridge
First Name
Dave
Nice to see you're doing both oob. That will allow us to see what you actually get and how the two kits compare.

Is anyone else fed up of looking at build reviews where the amount of AM/scratchbuilding adds up to an entirely different kit to the one we've shelled out our hard-earned pennies for - and is therefore useless as a review?
 

JR

Member of the Rabble and Pyromania Consultant
SMF Supporter
Joined
May 26, 2015
Messages
17,275
Points
113
Location
lincs
First Name
John
Nice to see you're doing both oob. That will allow us to see what you actually get and how the two kits compare.

Is anyone else fed up of looking at build reviews where the amount of AM/scratchbuilding adds up to an entirely different kit to the one we've shelled out our hard-earned pennies for - and is therefore useless as a review?
Ending up in costing more than the original kit Dave .
 

stona

SMF Supporter
Joined
Jul 22, 2008
Messages
11,472
Points
113
First Name
Steve
Nice to see you're doing both oob. That will allow us to see what you actually get and how the two kits compare.

Is anyone else fed up of looking at build reviews where the amount of AM/scratchbuilding adds up to an entirely different kit to the one we've shelled out our hard-earned pennies for - and is therefore useless as a review?

I know what you mean.
If you can't get a decent result with what's in the box, what's the point? If either kit came with a harness, I'd use it. I haven't actually opened either kit yet. Alternative markings are hardly compromising the build of what's in the box.
Anyway, I'm just a bloke that likes building model kits, I have no dog in any fight, I'm just doing it for fun.
 
Top