- Joined
- Apr 28, 2018
- Messages
- 6,212
- Points
- 113
- First Name
- Bob
and not very accurate. I even think the sdkfz number is wrong - my refs say 167
Yep.167, theres not a huge amount of books on the IV, i have wants about. The new books from History facts on the Pz IV will i have been told by Peter Muller a detailed section on the StuG IVand not very accurate. I even think the sdkfz number is wrong - my refs say 167
Hi SteveIts the best they could do when the Alkett factory was bashed up beyond production.
Its the slightly bigger brother, with more wheels but the same other bits.
Its the 1/2 brother by a different mother.
I am sure you will do him proud, 6 wheels or 8
Regards
Steve H
Hi, good to hear from youEven tough old it’s still a Tamiya so little probs in construction and some nice etch too.
Have fun Bob
Page 359 of Kraftfahrzeuge und Panzer der Reichswehr, Wehrmacht und Bundeswehr ab 1900 (Werner Oswald, Stuttgart: Motorbuch Verlag, 2004) agrees with the table you posted, and comparing the two, I don’t get the impression one is a direct copy of the other. However, this doesn’t really prove anything substantial, of course. Oddly, Spielberger’s Sturmgeschütze doesn’t seem to give an Sd.Kfz. number for the StuG IV at all.Me too Simon, but Kfzderwehrmacht site has a table of Sd. Kfz. numbers and it looks like this,
Cheeky, could always show this sticking a juicy.7.5 shell right up the ISU's rear hatch lolLooks good Bob, any chance you'll be using a green like 4BO, as you have some left.
I just found it does after all: page 182 also calls it Sd.Kfz. 167 in a table with monthly production figures.Oddly, Spielberger’s Sturmgeschütze doesn’t seem to give an Sd.Kfz. number for the StuG IV at all.
For FULL Forum access you can upgrade your account here UPGRADE