OH I SEE Ron yea i heard she was the R/N BIGGEST SUBThanks chaps.
Chris.
I read that once fitted out, the ship settled too low in the water and this caused her quarter deck to be far too close to sea level and was constantly shipping water. Even in a moderate sea.
This was blamed on a miscalculation by the designers.
And the faster she went the deeper the rear dug in.I think that was due to extra armour being added after construction had started. This was a response to Jutland battlecruiser losses. The extra weight took about four feet off of her freeboard apparently.
570 I have no doubt years of working as a chippy have honed your skills at doing a sight measurement and going from there.Thanks for the humorous and complimentary posts chaps.
As to the questions.....
Bob, difficult to answer really. Sounds a bit of a cop out, but I sort of just take a look at whats required and guess the size, cut a bit of plastic card and then snip and file away until I think it looks o.k.. The forward breakwater is a good example.
Rick. Unfortunately, the '400' Zulus, having been scattered all over the floor in my den, again, are fully occupied trying to figure out how to get back up to the Rorke's Drift shelf!
Chris. Luckily, thus far, I can still get away with a pair of reading glasses. I'll model her in a sea that is rough enough to show the balls up the designers made of her quarter deck!
Here's the 'modified' rear tower.
View attachment 428557
View attachment 428558
View attachment 428559
Thanks for the continued interest.
Ron
570 I have no doubt years of working as a chippy have honed your skills at doing a sight measurement and going from there.
Yours 453.
For FULL Forum access you can upgrade your account here UPGRADE