Steve Jones
Steve Jones Scale Modelling Site
Sorry to hear about all the issues you have been encountering. Its a shame as your doing such a great job. I hope it all comes good in the end
Absolute scale thickness might not be achievable anyway, but in any case you’d have such a job putting it all together neatly that I’d consider it not doable myself anyway.I don't think it would be doable with Evergreen - scale thickness would be 0.125 mm, 0.005”.
I would be tempted to look at 3D printing. It would need material that can be laid down finely enough, of course, but given that, I consider it to be more doable than glueing hundreds or even thousands of pieces of plastic strip together accurately.Might be possible in brass, but there are 23 horizontal bars on each side of the hull, in 5 sections, each of which has 3 vertical round bars and a vertical slat each side of the section. Then there's the front, rear, and turret. Possible, but far from simple.
Thanks Laurie. Yes, I remember that dio, but I'd forgotten there was a Warrior. Must try to find it again. Do you remember having problems with the turret hatches fouling on the bar armour?Nice work on that monster Pete. Built it as part of the Afghanistan diorama of all British stuff used in that conflict.
Fun starts on the bar armour hung on the Warrior. Advice paint the Warrior & hang on the bar armour afterwards.
Matter of interest there were Warriors out there with out the bar armour. They acted as recovery for the Warriors
who broke down.
Laurie
Interesting thought Jakko. I don't know anyone who could do the design for 3D printing though, let alone the actual printing with a suitable resolution. It would have to be brass, I think.Absolute scale thickness might not be achievable anyway, but in any case you’d have such a job putting it all together neatly that I’d consider it not doable myself anyway.
I would be tempted to look at 3D printing. It would need material that can be laid down finely enough, of course, but given that, I consider it to be more doable than glueing hundreds or even thousands of pieces of plastic strip together accurately.
I'm told it was referred to in the field as the "monkey cage"! It certainly made the vehicle look very different.Pete
The bar armour was planted stuck on for the Afghanistan conflict & ruined the looks of the vehicle.
That is even with the bar amour to the correct scale.
The vehicle was designed without bar armour in it's pristine self. Why not leave it off. In doing that
you will be able to see all the detail of the Warrior as designed not mucked about with.
My first had to have bar armour for Afghanistan. The second I have to build will not have the armour.
The Warrior looked sleek & war like before I put the armour on. Armour on it looked in comparison
like a spaceman due for take off. Ugly.
Just a thought.
Laurie
I cannot remember any problems Pete with the bar armour & the turret hatches. This is a picture from the build I did (not on this forum).Thanks Laurie. Yes, I remember that dio, but I'd forgotten there was a Warrior. Must try to find it again. Do you remember having problems with the turret hatches fouling on the bar armour?
I agree, painting after fitting the armour would not be possible. I'm sure there were Warriors in Afghanistan without the bar armour, but perhaps not this specific version with the additional aerials.
Anyway, it'll need tracks, lights, and the rest of the parts whether I fit the armour or not, so I can press on.
Pete
Yes I had the full Airfix PE set (Eduard manufactured of course)Thanks Laurie. You haven't got the hatches fitted there though.
Looks as if you had the PE set?
Pete
Thanks Laurie. You haven't got the hatches fitted there though.
Looks as if you had the PE set?
Pete
The design is the real problem — printing is easy enough through Shapeways or similar companies. I could probably knock up a set of this armour if I wanted to, but I just know there will be all kinds of pitfalls that would make me wish I hadn’tInteresting thought Jakko. I don't know anyone who could do the design for 3D printing though, let alone the actual printing with a suitable resolution.
I would have thought they'd have included the bar armour in the PE. I think I've found the problem with the hatches fouling the armour - user error! That armour was a nightmare to fit, and as you said the instructions were a bit vague.
Yes the Armour in PE would have been really great. But Eduard only use thin metal & do
not think it would have worked.
Pity FLightpath did not do something. Their metal is twice the thickness plus they do a
better job altogether than Eduard.
One thing I did do which helps visually is to hang things around the bar armour.
Ha ha I had that dilemma Petebut as it was to be authentic for the Afghanistan diorama I did not have that option.Thanks Laurie, it does look better with things hanging off it. I don't know why they supplied a mesh to go in front of the thermal imaging system, as the real thing didn't have that, and I'm sure it would have affected the thermal system's performance.
The thinness of Eduard PE would be OK for the slats if it was horizontal - they's have to make several hundred slats with holes for the vertical rods etched in. Might be an interesting exercise for someone who made their own etch. I suppose another alternative would have been to make a 'grid' of the right size but then twist the bars to be horizontal. The bending wouldn't be easy though.
Decision made - NO bar armour!
Pete
For FULL Forum access you can upgrade your account here UPGRADE